a person holding a cell phone in their hand

Why I Don’t Follow the 4% Rule

You’ve probably heard of the 4% Rule — it’s the retirement world’s holy grail. The idea is simple: take 4% of your portfolio each year, adjust for inflation, and statistically, you won’t run out of money for 30 years.

It’s smart in theory — but it’s also built on the assumption that you’re okay spending down your life’s work. I’m not.

My approach is different: I never touch the principal. Ever. I live entirely off what my portfolio throws off — the dividends, interest, and distributions — and I treat the core like sacred ground. That money works for me. I don’t liquidate it; I leverage it.

The upside? I’ll never run out.

My monthly income may fluctuate slightly with the markets, but my principal is still sitting there — earning, producing, compounding, and ultimately, passing on to my kids. I don’t lose sleep over selling shares at a bad time, or watching the market nosedive the same year I need to withdraw cash.

The trade-off is obvious: low growth.

When you build a portfolio around yield, you sacrifice some appreciation. My net worth might not soar year to year — but my lifestyle is funded, my stress is low, and my future is predictable. That’s worth more to me than a few extra basis points.

Here’s how I look at it:

  • The 4% rule is about survival.
  • My approach is about sustainability.
  • The 4% rule assumes you’ll draw down and fade out.
  • My approach builds an engine that outlives you.

If your goal is to die with zero, follow the 4% rule.

If your goal is to live free and leave something behind — live off the dividends and never touch the machine.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get smart strategies for college costs, career success and long term wealth in your inbox!

Email icon